Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Subcategories

Chinese (Ethical-Religious)

1 of 186 entries in Religions. Click any to see everything it connects to.

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Chinese traditions that centre on right conduct, social order and the proper performance of rites rather than on doctrine about gods, but which acquired temples, a canon and a religious life of their own. Whether such a system is a philosophy or a religion is a modern and contested question; the Atlas classes these traditions as religious because that is how they have been practised.

Facts
Overview
What Defines This Grouping
Chinese traditions centred on right conduct, social order and the correct performance of rites rather than on doctrine about gods, which nonetheless acquired temples, a canon, a calendar of observance and a religious life of their own. 2
Status
Standing as a Comparative Category
Contested: whether this is a religion, a philosophy or an ethical system is a question the Western category itself produced, and the field has not settled it. The atlas classes it as religious because that is how it has been practised. 2
Directory
Category
Religions 1
Origins
Whose Classification This Is
Confucianism is a European coinage, formed in Jesuit Latin from Kong Fuzi. Chinese usage names the ru, the classicists, and has no single word for the ism the Western term supposes. 3
Learn More
Chinese Ethical-Religious Tradition

This group holds a Chinese tradition classed as ethical-religious, a tradition rooted in the Chinese cultural world that functions at once as a system of ethics and social order and as a religion with rites and reverence. Confucianism is the paradigm case, oriented to moral cultivation, ritual propriety and the ancestors.

The browser will find the tradition the atlas classes here. The entries describe it in its own terms, noting the long scholarly debate over whether it is best called a religion, a philosophy, or both at once.

Sources
2. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005s.v. ConfucianismView the Source
3. The Five "Confucian" Classics
Michael Nylan, Yale University Press, 2001View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.