Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Divinity Atlas Directory Taxonomy, First Edition Category Tree

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is the atlas's own internal record, not outside scholarship: the first edition's category tree, the register that says which subcategory sits under which category and in what order, carried forward as the skeleton this edition's browsing directory still uses. It establishes exactly one thing, which category a given subcategory belongs to, and nothing about any tradition, deity or practice. It is cited at the highest reliability level because it is the only possible authority on a purely structural fact of the atlas's own making, in the same way a library's own shelving scheme is the authority on where a library shelves a book. It is never evidence for a claim about the world outside the atlas, only for how the atlas has chosen to file its own material.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The atlas's own record of its own category structure, the only possible authority for which subcategory a grouping belongs to, and a purely structural claim rather than a claim about any tradition.
Notes
The first edition's own category tree, the source its browsing directory is built from. It carries the key, the display label, the parent category and the listing position for every subcategory the atlas files things under. It establishes one thing and only one thing: which category a given subcategory belongs to. It makes no claim about any tradition, and it is cited here rather than left uncited because a structural fact still owes a reader an answer to the question of who says so.
Citation
Source Type
reference-database
Claims Backed By This Source (2,271 claims)

This source backs 2,271 claims across the atlas. As facts: 1,138 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1,131 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Subcategories, 2,258 claims: 1,129 well-attested, 1,129 general references.
  • Open Questions, 9 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.