Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Subcategories

Bound Manuscripts

3 of 33 entries in Textual Witnesses. Click any to see everything it connects to.

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Handwritten volumes bound as books, kept apart from the codices by convention rather than by anything structural. Codex is the word scholars use for the parchment book of the ancient Mediterranean world, and it sits oddly on a later paper volume or on a scribe's fair copy prepared for a printer. What these have in common is that a community treated one bound copy as the copy, the one a text was checked against, read from in worship, or carried to the press. That gives such a volume a standing the words alone do not have, which is why the binding, the hands that wrote it, the corrections on its pages and its custody since are all recorded.

Facts
Directory
Category
Manuscripts 1
Learn More
Three Bound Volumes a Scripture's Entire Wording Rests On

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Bound Manuscripts gathers three witnesses the atlas catalogues under this node because each is a single physical volume whose survival, rather than any printed edition, is what its scripture's wording ultimately rests on.

The Shinpukuji Kojiki is the oldest surviving manuscript of Japan's oldest book, copied by a Buddhist monk in Nagoya in 1371 and 1372, six hundred and fifty nine years after the text was first presented to the court; nothing earlier survives, and the six intervening centuries are represented only by a colophon noting one lost exemplar. The Printer's Manuscript of the Book of Mormon is the working copy from which the first edition was typeset at Palmyra in 1830, written out mostly by Oliver Cowdery so the original dictation would not have to be handed to a printer, a precaution that mattered later when the sealed original lost most of its own pages to water damage. The Kartarpur Bir, held by the Sodhi family, is claimed by Sikh tradition to be the very volume Bhai Gurdas wrote down for Guru Arjan in 1604, though scholars have argued for over a century, on the evidence of erasures and a disputed index, over whether that identification actually holds.

What binds the three is physical singularity: each is the one bound object a whole textual tradition's wording is checked against, and in each case that dependence is itself contested or costly in a different way.

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.