Vices
Sloth (Acedia)
Also Known As Sloth
Belphegor
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 375 to 425 CE
Sloth, in Latin acedia, is spiritual apathy and negligence, a listlessness of soul that shrinks from the effort of the good; the medieval acedia was as much a despairing torpor of the spirit as mere bodily laziness. It is one of the seven capital sins, and its contrary virtue is Diligence. In Peter Binsfeld's scheme of demons it is assigned to Belphegor, and in the esoteric scheme used here to Saturn, the planet of heaviness and melancholy, though the planetary attributions of the sins vary by author. It is presented here academically, as a shadow entry.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period375 to 425 CE 1Tradition: Christian monasticism: the eight tempting thoughts of Evagrius and Cassian Origin Period590 2Tradition: Gregory the Great's seven capital vices Place of OriginThe monastic settlements of Nitria, Kellia and Scetis in the Egyptian desert, where the eight tempting thoughts were set out; the sevenfold Latin form is Gregory the Great's, at Rome 3 Origin of the NameLatin acedia, a loan from the Greek akedia, want of care or indifference. The English sloth carries a suggestion of idleness that neither word has, and the term took its present scope when Gregory merged tristitia, sorrow, into acedia 2 Origin of the NameThe demon this vice carries as its subtitle, Belphegor, comes from the classification of demons published by Peter Binsfeld, suffragan bishop of Trier, in 1589 in a treatise arguing that confessions extracted under torture should be believed. The pairing belongs to the witch trials, not to the theological tradition 4 Attributed Author / CompilerEvagrius Ponticus (c. 345-399), who set out the eight tempting thoughts, and John Cassian, who carried them west; Gregory the Great (c. 540-604), whose Moralia in Job produced the sevenfold scheme 3 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceGreek akedia, the noonday demon of Psalm 91: the listlessness that overtakes a monk in the middle of the day, when the cell becomes unbearable, the hours crawl and the life seems a mistake. A compound of boredom, restlessness and despair, and not a reluctance to work 1Tradition: Christian monasticism: the eight tempting thoughts of Evagrius and Cassian Meaning in the Attesting SourceSorrow at the divine good: a sadness that shrinks from the effort the spiritual life requires. Aquinas classes it as a sin against the joy that belongs to charity, which is a considerably narrower thing than laziness 6Tradition: Aquinas, Summa Theologiae Meaning in the Attesting SourceThe result of a merger, not a single term. Gregory produced the seven partly by folding tristitia, sorrow, into acedia, so the vice the atlas calls sloth carries two of the eight thoughts inside it 2Tradition: Gregory the Great's seven capital vices Status
Status Within the TraditionStandard teaching, not formally defined 5Tradition: Roman Catholicism Sourced to the subject's own accountOne of the seven capital sins as the Catechism enumerates them. The list in this form, with pride among the seven and acedia in place of tristitia, is the Catechism's; neither Gregory nor Aquinas gives it in exactly this shape Doctrinal Status DetailThe medieval acedia named here is a despairing torpor of the spirit, not merely physical laziness in the modern sense, following Evagrius Ponticus's own original treatment of the vice. 1 Disputed
Origin PeriodRooted in Evagrius Ponticus's eight tempting thoughts, set out from the Egyptian desert monastic settlements of Nitria, Kellia and Scetis around the late fourth century CE, and carried west by John Cassian. Gregory the Great reduced the eight to the familiar seven, sloth among them, in his Moralia in Job around 590 CE. 3 Learn More
Sloth
Sloth, acedia, is the most easily misunderstood of the seven, because the English word suggests mere laziness and the Latin term does not mean that. Akedia in Evagrius is the noonday demon of Psalm 91, the listlessness that overtakes a monk in the middle of the day, when the cell becomes unbearable, the hours crawl, the work seems pointless and the life seems a mistake; it is a spiritual condition compounded of boredom, restlessness and despair rather than a reluctance to work, and Evagrius describes it with a precision that has struck many modern readers as clinical. Gregory merged tristitia, sorrow, into it when he reduced the eight to seven. Aquinas defines it as sorrow at the divine good, a sadness that shrinks from the effort the spiritual life requires, and classes it as a sin against the joy that belongs to charity.
Cassian, following Evagrius, had treated tristitia, worldly sorrow or despondency, as a distinct affliction from acedia, drawing on Paul's distinction at 2 Corinthians 7:10 between a godly sorrow that produces repentance and a worldly sorrow that produces death; when Gregory folded tristitia into acedia to reach his sevenfold scheme, later commentators note that some of the sharper psychological distinctions the desert fathers had drawn between the two states were correspondingly lost, one reason modern readers recovering Evagrius's fuller eightfold analysis have found it more clinically precise than Gregory's more compressed later synthesis.
Acedia and Its Modern Reception
Because Evagrius's description is so exact, acedia has attracted a good deal of modern attention, and comparisons have been drawn with depression and with burnout. Those comparisons need care in both directions. The desert writers were describing something they treated as a spiritual condition with spiritual remedies, chiefly perseverance, manual work and staying in the cell; depression is a medical condition, and treating it as a failure of will or a sin would be both a category error and a harm. What the ancient analysis does offer, and what has kept it in circulation, is an unusually good phenomenological description of a state that modern vocabulary handles poorly. The virtue set against sloth in the popular scheme is diligence or zeal, and the corresponding demon in the 1589 classification is Belphegor.
The seventeenth-century scholar Robert Burton, in his Anatomy of Melancholy, drew directly on the older monastic vocabulary of acedia while assimilating it to the emerging early modern medical category of melancholy, a synthesis that helped carry something of the desert fathers' analysis of spiritual listlessness into the developing language of mental affliction centuries before clinical psychiatry existed; historians of the concept, including the literary scholar Stanley Jackson in his study of melancholy's history, have traced this line from Evagrius through Burton as one of the more traceable genealogies connecting a specifically religious vice to a modern psychological category, without treating the two as simply identical.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
Contrasts With
A capital sin, not a mortal one. Sloth names a root from which further sins grow; the gravity of a particular act is settled by matter, knowledge and consent rather than by membership of the list of seven.
Acedia is Evagrius's akedia unchanged, the listlessness that afflicts a monk in the middle of the day and which he calls the noonday demon. In its original setting it is a condition to be treated, not an offence to be confessed.
Held Differently
Acedia in the Eastern tradition is despondency, the noonday demon of the desert fathers, an affliction that empties the soul of its labour, rather than the laziness the Western list came to name.
Lupe (Distress), Vices Evagrius Ponticus, whose diagnosis of the eight afflictive thoughts stands behind the medieval capital sin of sloth or acedia, drew directly on Stoic passion theory in framing distress and listlessness as disorders of judgment; the monastic vice and the Stoic passion are related by that borrowed framework rather than being the same claim.
Element Of
Sloth is among the capital sins in the Roman enumeration, spiritual laziness that refuses the joy that comes from God.
Opposed By
Diligence is the classical contrary virtue paired against Sloth, one of the seven remedial virtues the medieval tradition, following Prudentius's Psychomachia, set one against one with the seven capital sins.
A vow sustained across countless lifetimes is the direct contrary of a collapse of resolve; Sloth, already catalogued among the seven deadly sins, is the atlas's existing entry nearest that failure, a cross-tradition approximation rather than an equivalence.
Virtus is proven through active effort and struggle; Sloth, the failure of will and effort already catalogued among the seven deadly sins, is its clearest existing contrary, a cross-tradition pairing on the same footing as other opposes edges on this axis.
Originates in Language
Sources
1. The Praktikos and Chapters on Prayer
Evagrius Ponticus; John Eudes Bamberger (trans.), Cistercian Publications, 1972Praktikos, ch. 6 and the chapters on the eight thoughtsView the Source 2. Moralia in Job
Gregory the GreatBook XXXI, the merging of tristitia and acedia
3. The Seven Deadly Sins: An Introduction to the History of a Religious Concept, with Special Reference to Medieval English Literature
Morton W. Bloomfield, Michigan State College Press, 1952ch. 2, from Evagrius and Cassian to GregoryView the Source 4. Tractatus de confessionibus maleficorum et sagarum
Peter Binsfeld, Trier, 1589the classification of demons by the capital vicesView the Source 5. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd edition
Holy See, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1997paragraph 1866, the seven capital sinsthe holders' own accountView the Source 6. Summa Theologiae
The Institutes (De Institutis Coenobiorum)
John CassianBook X, on the spirit of accidie
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.