Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Wars & Conflicts

Muslim Conquest of the Levant

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Rashidun Caliphate's campaign, begun under Caliph Abu Bakr and completed under his successor Umar, to conquer the Byzantine-ruled provinces of Syria and Palestine. Muslim forces under commanders including Khalid ibn al-Walid and Amr ibn al-As won a decisive victory over a large Byzantine army at the Battle of Yarmouk in 636, which effectively ended organized Byzantine resistance in the region, and went on to capture Damascus, Jerusalem, Antioch and the other principal cities of the Levant within two years.

Facts
Consequences
What It Settled
A rapid and lasting transformation of the region's political and religious map: Byzantine rule in Syria and Palestine ended permanently, the conquered Christian and Jewish population was governed under the caliphate's customary terms for protected non-Muslim subjects rather than expelled or forcibly converted en masse, and the Levant became a core province of successive Islamic caliphates for centuries afterward. 1
Religious Dimension
Framed in the Islamic historical tradition as a continuation of the expansion that began with the Ridda Wars, extending the caliphate's authority beyond Arabia in the name of Islam; the conquest brought Jerusalem, sacred to Judaism, Christianity and Islam alike, under Muslim rule for the first time, and Caliph Umar's own reported visit to the city and negotiated terms with its Christian patriarch Sophronius became a foundational precedent for Islamic governance of other faiths' holy sites. 1
The Event
When It Happened
634 to 638, from the campaign's opening under Abu Bakr to the capture of Damascus, Jerusalem and Antioch following the Battle of Yarmouk. 1
Period
from 634 1
The conventional dates historians use for the conquest of the Levant, from the first Muslim raids into Byzantine Syria in 634 to the fall of Jerusalem and the last major cities by 638.
Period
to 638 1
Principal Parties
The Rashidun Caliphate under Umar ibn al-Khattab, its armies commanded by Khalid ibn al-Walid and Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah, against the Byzantine Empire under Emperor Heraclius, whose field army was decisively broken at Yarmouk. 1
Open Questions
Death Toll Assessment
No scholarly estimate of the total dead in the Muslim conquest of the Levant exists. The decisive Battle of Yarmouk is closely studied, but no historian has combined it with the conquest's many sieges and smaller engagements into one figure.
Hugh Kennedy's history of the early Arab conquests covers Yarmouk and the fall of the Levantine cities in narrative and strategic detail without offering a casualty total for the campaign, and cautions that the Byzantine and early Islamic sources disagree sharply on the numbers involved at Yarmouk itself.
Learn More
The Battle of Yarmouk and the Fall of Byzantine Syria

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

The Muslim Conquest of the Levant was the Rashidun Caliphate's campaign, begun under Caliph Abu Bakr and completed under his successor Umar ibn al-Khattab, to conquer the Byzantine-ruled provinces of Syria and Palestine in their entirety. Muslim forces under commanders including Khalid ibn al-Walid and Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah won a decisive victory over a large Byzantine army under Emperor Heraclius himself at the Battle of Yarmouk in 636, which effectively ended organized Byzantine resistance in the whole region for good.

The victorious forces went on to capture Damascus, Jerusalem, Antioch and the other principal cities of the Levant within two years of the victory at Yarmouk itself. Byzantine rule in Syria and Palestine ended permanently as a result, and the conquered Christian and Jewish population was governed under the caliphate's own customary terms for protected non-Muslim subjects rather than expelled or forcibly converted en masse by the new authorities. The speed of the conquest that followed Yarmouk, with Damascus, Jerusalem and Antioch all falling within two years of a single battlefield victory, left Byzantine emperor Heraclius reportedly unable to organize any further serious counteroffensive to recover the provinces he had just lost.

Umar's Visit to Jerusalem and a Precedent for Ruling Other Faiths

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

The Muslim Conquest of the Levant is framed in the Islamic historical tradition as a direct continuation of the expansion that began with the Ridda Wars, extending the caliphate's own authority beyond Arabia in the name of Islam rather than as any separate undertaking from what came before it. Its religious significance went well beyond territorial conquest alone: the campaign brought Jerusalem, sacred to Judaism, Christianity and Islam alike, under Muslim rule for the first time in its long and contested history.

Caliph Umar's own reported visit to Jerusalem in person, and the terms he negotiated directly with the city's Christian patriarch Sophronius, became a foundational precedent for Islamic governance of other faiths' holy sites more broadly, a model later Islamic rule across the conquered Levant drew on repeatedly in the many centuries that followed Umar's own visit. The Levant became a core province of successive Islamic caliphates for centuries after the conquest that had begun at Yarmouk in 636. Later Islamic rulers across the medieval period, from the Umayyads through the Ottomans, continued to cite Umar's own conduct at Jerusalem as the standard against which their treatment of the city's Christian and Jewish communities was measured, giving a single seventh century visit an influence that extended across more than a thousand years of subsequent Islamic governance.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Abu Bakr, Figures

This source names Abu Bakr directly: "campaign, begun under Caliph Abu Bakr and completed under his successor Umar, to conquer the Byzantine-ruled provinces of Syria and Palestine."

Antioch, Cities

This source names Antioch directly: "on to capture Damascus, Jerusalem, Antioch and the other principal cities of the Levant within two years."

Damascus, Cities

This source names Damascus directly: "in the region, and went on to capture Damascus, Jerusalem, Antioch and the other principal cities of the Levant within two years."

Palestine, Countries

This source names Palestine directly: "Byzantine-ruled provinces of Syria and Palestine."

Syria, Countries

This source names Syria directly: "the Byzantine-ruled provinces of Syria and Palestine."

The Levant, Regions

This source names The Levant directly: "and the other principal cities of the Levant within two years."

Umar, Figures

This source names Umar directly: "Bakr and completed under his successor Umar, to conquer the Byzantine-ruled provinces of Syria and Palestine."

Belongs to Tradition

Sources
1. The Great Arab Conquests: How the Spread of Islam Changed the World We Live In
Hugh Kennedy, Da Capo Press, 2007fact about the event's date
1. The Great Arab Conquests: How the Spread of Islam Changed the World We Live In
Hugh Kennedy, Da Capo Press, 2007Belongs to Tradition: Islam
Open Questions (1 open question)
What Was the Total Death Toll of the Muslim Conquest of the Levant?

The Byzantine and early Islamic sources for the conquest's decisive battle at Yarmouk disagree sharply on the size of the forces involved, and the conquest itself unfolded as a long sequence of sieges and smaller engagements across Syria and Palestine that the scholarship narrates city by city rather than totals.

What would resolve this A source critical study reconciling the Byzantine and early Islamic casualty traditions for Yarmouk, combined with a historian's accounting of losses across the conquest's separate sieges.
Early Islamic history, Byzantine history, source criticism.Hugh Kennedy, The Great Arab Conquests: How the Spread of Islam Changed the World We Live In
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.