Artifacts & Relics
Michigan Relics
Also Known As Soper-Scotford Relics (English) Latin script. Named for the two men behind them.
Other Artifacts
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The Michigan Relics are a large body of forged artifacts, clay tablets, copper tools, and slate carvings covered with pseudo-ancient inscriptions and biblical scenes, claimed to have been dug from mounds across Michigan around the turn of the twentieth century. Produced by James Scotford and promoted by Daniel Soper, they drew in religious collectors, including a Catholic priest and, for a time, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which held part of the collection. The site records them as debunked, with the forgery scholarship cited and the custody history noted neutrally.
Facts
Debunked
MakersManufactured by James O. Scotford 1 The Bentley Historical Library's Frauds in the Field, University of Michigan, 2019, draws on eyewitness testimony collected in 1911, when associates of James O. Scotford described watching the clay and copper objects being manufactured and planted for later discovery, and on a 2001 re-examination of the objects' manufacturing technique and materials. Both lines of evidence point the same way: the 1911 testimony names who made them and how, and the 2001 material analysis found tool marks and fabrication methods consistent with nineteenth century workshop production rather than any ancient technique, which is why the maker is established rather than debated. MakersPromoted by Daniel E. Soper, c. 1890-1920 1 The Bentley Historical Library's Frauds in the Field, University of Michigan, 2019, draws on eyewitness testimony collected in 1911, when associates of James O. Scotford described watching the clay and copper objects being manufactured and planted for later discovery, and on a 2001 re-examination of the objects' manufacturing technique and materials. Both lines of evidence point the same way: the 1911 testimony names who made them and how, and the 2001 material analysis found tool marks and fabrication methods consistent with nineteenth century workshop production rather than any ancient technique, which is why the maker is established rather than debated. Custody and Display
LDS CustodyA large portion was held by the LDS Church's Salt Lake City museum 2 LDS CustodyTransferred to the Michigan History Museum in 2003 2 Scholarship and Forensics
Forensic VerdictRichard Stamps' 2001 analysis (Oakland University) concluded the relics are forgeries. 1 Physical Form
MaterialClay tablets, copper implements and slate carvings (a large mixed-material body of pieces, not one object). 1 Physical Description
ExtentThousands of pieces (clay tablets, copper implements, slate carvings). 1 Learn More
Overview
The Michigan Relics are a large collection, numbering in the thousands, of forged artifacts said to have been unearthed from mounds across Michigan between the 1890s and the 1920s. Made of clay, copper, and slate and covered with a confused mixture of alphabets and with scenes drawn largely from the Bible, they were promoted as evidence that an ancient literate people of Old World origin had once lived in the American Midwest. They circulated among collectors with religious motivations, most notably the Detroit Catholic priest James Savage, and a substantial portion was for many years held by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, whose leaders considered whether the objects might relate to Book of Mormon peoples without ever officially endorsing them.
Scholarly and forensic examination has shown the relics to be modern forgeries, manufactured by James Scotford and promoted by Daniel Soper. The site records them as debunked, cites the analytical scholarship, and notes the custody history, including the 2003 transfer of the LDS-held portion to a Michigan museum, neutrally.
History and Provenance
The operation centred on James O. Scotford, a sign-writer and sometime showman, and Daniel E. Soper, a former Michigan Secretary of State who had left office under a cloud. From the 1890s they produced objects and staged their discovery on digs to which local notables, clergy, physicians, officials, were invited to be the ones to lift the finds from the ground, lending an air of legitimacy. Over three decades the number of pieces grew into the thousands.
Religious collectors were especially drawn in: Father James Savage of Detroit amassed a large group and defended them to the end of his life, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints acquired and kept a substantial portion, curious whether the relics might corroborate its scriptural account of ancient American peoples. The objects thus passed through several religious institutions before their forgery was fully established, which is part of why they remained in circulation so long.
Authenticity and Scholarship
The claim was that the relics were genuine ancient artifacts documenting an Old World presence in America. The case against them was strong from early on and is now conclusive. The inscriptions combine incompatible scripts in ways no real ancient culture would, and the biblical scenes reflect nineteenth-century Christian iconography; the workmanship is fresh and betrays modern tools. In 1911 Scotford's own stepdaughter said she had seen him manufacture the objects.
In 2001 the Oakland University archaeologist Richard Stamps subjected a sample to modern forensic examination, looking at tool marks, patina, and materials, and concluded that they were forgeries. The BYU Studies treatment by Ashurst-McGee, Grua and Jensen documents both the fraud and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' handling of the material, including its decision to transfer its portion to the Michigan History Museum in 2003. No scholarly authority defends the relics as authentic; they endure as one of the largest and longest-running archaeological frauds in American history.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Attested In
Belongs to Tradition
Housed At
Related To
Another nineteenth century American find offered as proof of an ancient literate presence in the interior, and rejected on the same kind of internal evidence.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.