Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Custodians & Museums

Michigan History Center

Museums

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Michigan History Center is the agency of Michigan state government responsible for the state's historical museum and archival collections, based in Lansing. Its holdings span the state's Native American, colonial, industrial and political history, and include the Michigan Relics, a large body of inscribed clay, copper and slate objects produced as a hoax around the turn of the twentieth century and long since exposed as fabrications rather than genuine ancient artifacts. The Center preserves the relics as a documented case of historical fraud rather than presenting them as authentic. It operates museum and archival facilities open to the public and to researchers.

Facts
Debunked
Relevant Holding
Mormonism's Encounter with the Michigan Relics (Mark Ashurst-McGee, David W. Grua and Robin Scott Jensen, BYU Studies, 2010) documents the Michigan Relics, a large body of inscribed clay, copper and slate objects produced as a hoax from the 1890s onward and long since exposed as fabrications, which the Michigan History Center, the state government agency responsible for Michigan's historical museum and archival collections in Lansing, now preserves as a documented case of historical fraud rather than as authentic ancient artifacts. 2
Organisation
Institution FoundedSourced to the subject's own account
Michigan's state historical museum traces its founding to the Michigan Historical Commission of 1913, moving into its present Lansing building in 1989. 1
Governing BodySourced to the subject's own account
Government of Michigan 1
Public AccessSourced to the subject's own account
Open to the Public 1
Learn More
A State Agency That Keeps the Evidence of a Fraud

The Michigan History Center functions as the state government's general history museum and archival body, collecting and preserving material across the full span of Michigan's past, from Indigenous history through European settlement, industrial development and twentieth century political life. This broad, state-level collecting mandate is precisely why it, rather than any specialised museum, holds the Michigan Relics: a large body of material that documents not an authentic ancient culture but a real historical event, namely an extensive and long-running early twentieth century hoax, which the Center preserves as a legitimate part of Michigan's documented history regardless of the objects' own inauthenticity.

Treating fraudulent artifacts as worthy of state archival preservation reflects a specific institutional judgment: the objects themselves may be fakes, but the episode they document, how thousands of forged pieces were produced, promoted and believed by many contemporaries over several decades, is a genuine and historically significant Michigan story in its own right, one the Center considers worth keeping evidence for rather than discarding as valueless once debunked. That decision to keep rather than deaccession a known fake reflects the difference between a museum's collecting mission and a private owner's reputation, since a state archive answers to the historical record rather than to any interest in appearing never to have been fooled.

One of America's Largest and Longest-Running Artifact Hoaxes

Beginning in the 1890s, James O. Scotford, at times working with the former Michigan state official Daniel E. Soper, produced and progressively "discovered" a steadily growing stream of inscribed clay tablets, copper tools and slate carvings on digs across the state, to which respectable local witnesses were regularly invited in order to lend the finds outside credibility. The objects carried a distinctive and, in retrospect, telling mixture of biblical scenes, invented pictographic scripts and imagery borrowed indiscriminately from genuinely ancient but geographically unrelated cultures, a jumbled quality that mainstream archaeologists recognised as inconsistent almost from the start.

Despite that early scholarly skepticism, the relics found real popular and some religious support for decades, feeding into the same broader Mound Builder and lost-tribe narratives that also drove interest in the Newark Holy Stones, and the sheer volume Scotford and Soper produced, reportedly numbering in the thousands of individual pieces, makes the Michigan Relics one of the largest single fabrication efforts of its kind documented in North America. No archaeological or historical institution today regards the objects as authentic, and the Michigan History Center's custodianship reflects that settled consensus, presenting the collection as a case study in fraud rather than as evidence for any ancient Old World presence in Michigan.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Source Mormonism's Encounter with the Michigan RelicsMark Ashurst-McGee, David W. Grua, Robin Scott Jensen
Source Mormonism's Encounter with the Michigan RelicsMark Ashurst-McGee, David W. Grua, Robin Scott Jensen

Contained In

Houses

Related To

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints held a large part of the Michigan Relics after its own apostle James E. Talmage examined them and concluded they were fraudulent, and later transferred that collection to the Michigan state museum.

Source Mormonism's Encounter with the Michigan RelicsMark Ashurst-McGee, David W. Grua, Robin Scott Jensen
Sources
1. Michigan History Center (institutional record)
Michigan History Center (Michigan Department of Natural Resources, State of Michigan)the holders' own accountView the Source
2. Mormonism's Encounter with the Michigan Relics
Mark Ashurst-McGee, David W. Grua, Robin Scott Jensen, BYU Studies, 2010View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.