Deities
Maya Deities
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Hunab Ku, the one god, appears in colonial Yucatec sources, chiefly the Motul dictionary and material connected with the Books of Chilam Balam, as a single, unknowable creator. Those sources were produced by or for missionaries whose work was teaching Christian monotheism in the Maya language, and a term for the one true god was precisely what that work required. Many scholars therefore treat Hunab Ku as a colonial coinage, or at least a colonial promotion of something marginal, rather than a deity of pre-conquest cult; there is no clear Classic-period evidence for him. The quartered black and white emblem sold today as his sign has no ancient basis whatever: it derives from a rubber-stamp design published in the twentieth century and was popularised by writers of the modern Maya-revival current.
Facts
Attestation
Era of AttestationFirst attested in colonial Yucatec sources (Motul dictionary, Chilam Balam) 4 Era of AttestationNo clear Classic-period evidence 4 Veneration TodayVenerated in a modern revival tradition 4 Popularized by modern Maya-revival writers, not an ancient cult HistoricityNot a historical person: a divine or other-than-human being 1 Function
Domain / Function Attributions
Mythic AssociationThe quartered black and white emblem sold today as Hunab Ku's sign has no ancient basis: tradition traces it instead to a rubber-stamp design published in the twentieth century and popularised by writers of the modern Maya-revival movement. 2 Belief
TheologyPolytheistic: many gods 4 Origins
Origin of the NameHunab Ku is colonial Yucatec Maya for the one god, a term recorded chiefly in the Motul dictionary and Chilam Balam material connected with missionary teaching of Christian monotheism. 4 Cult
Attributes and IconographyQuartered black and white emblem, a modern design with no ancient basis 4 Learn More
A Colonial Term and a Modern Symbol, Not an Ancient God
Hunab Ku (roughly the One God or Sole God in Yucatec Maya) is a name with a complicated and much-misunderstood history, and one that illustrates how carefully the sources on Maya religion must be read. The term does not appear in any pre-conquest Maya inscription, codex or monument; it is found only in colonial-era documents written after the Spanish conquest, Yucatec dictionaries and catechetical texts compiled by Franciscan missionaries, where it was used to render the single supreme God of Christianity in the Maya language as a tool of conversion.
Many scholars therefore regard Hunab Ku, understood as a supreme creator-deity, as largely a product of the colonial encounter rather than an attested god of the independent Maya, though the underlying words are genuine Maya and some relate the term to the creator Itzamna. Separately, the modern circular Hunab Ku symbol popular in New Age and pan-Maya spirituality is a twentieth-century creation, adapted in the 1980s by the writer Jose Arguelles from a colonial-era Aztec (not Maya) design, and has no ancient Maya provenance. The honest summary is that Hunab Ku is real as a colonial term and a modern symbol, but not as a documented deity of the pre-conquest Maya, and the confident claims that the ancient Maya worshipped a single supreme god by this name go beyond the evidence.
Jose Arguelles and the Harmonic Convergence
The modern popularity of the Hunab Ku symbol and of Hunab Ku as a supposed ancient supreme deity owes its widest currency to a single figure: Jose Arguelles, an American author and art historian who published The Mayan Factor in 1987, a book that wove real Maya calendrical concepts together with new age cosmology, numerology and his own speculative theories about galactic cycles largely disconnected from the findings of professional Maya epigraphy and archaeology. Arguelles used the term Hunab Ku and popularized the circular quartered symbol as emblematic of a supposed ancient Maya conception of galactic unity and cosmic consciousness, and his book was closely tied to the Harmonic Convergence, a widely publicized set of synchronized gatherings he organized in August 1987 at sacred sites around the world, presented as marking the start of a transformative planetary cycle tied to Arguelles's reading of the Maya calendar. These claims found a large audience and fed directly into the broader wave of speculation about the Maya calendar that culminated decades later in the 2012 phenomenon, the widespread but scholarly baseless idea that the Maya had predicted some world-transforming event for December 2012, a date that corresponds only to the end of a long calendrical cycle in the Maya Long Count, not to any recorded ancient prophecy of catastrophe.
Professional Mayanists have been consistent in distancing their field from Arguelles's work and from the Hunab Ku symbol's supposed antiquity, and the episode stands as a case study in how a real civilization's genuine intellectual achievements, here a sophisticated calendar, could become raw material for a modern spiritual movement whose specific claims the ancient evidence does not support.
Correspondences & Relations
Cross-Tradition Connections
Worshipped In
Hunab Ku appears in colonial Yucatec Maya sources, chiefly the Motul dictionary and the Books of Chilam Balam, produced under Spanish missionary influence.
Source The MayaMichael D. Coe and Stephen Houston Sources
1. Popol Vuh: The Definitive Edition of the Mayan Book of the Dawn of Life
translated by Dennis Tedlock, Simon and Schuster, 1996
2. An Illustrated Dictionary of the Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya
Mary Miller and Karl Taube, Thames and Hudson, 1993s.v. Hunab KuView the Source 2. An Illustrated Dictionary of the Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya
Mary Miller and Karl Taube, Thames and Hudson, 1993On Hunab Ku as a colonial-period term rather than an attested pre-conquest deityView the Source 3. The Maya
Michael D. Coe and Stephen Houston, Thames and Hudson, 1966colonial sourcesView the Source 4. The Maya (9th edition)
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.