An Eastern Liturgical Rite in Full Communion With Rome, Beliefs & Restrictions
Standing
Concerns Point in Dispute
Currently States The arrangement is contested from the Orthodox side, where these churches are often read as an instrument of absorption rather than as a model of union.
The Eastern Catholic churches, Byzantine, Syriac, Armenian, Coptic and East Syriac among them, each keep their own rite, liturgical language, canon law and devotional life while holding the Catholic faith and communion with the bishop of Rome. Ronald Roberson's survey, published by the Pontifical Oriental Institute in Rome, a Catholic institution, presents the arrangement as a model of legitimate diversity within Catholic unity. From the Orthodox side, and this is the substance of the dispute, the same churches are often read differently: as bodies drawn out of Orthodox communion into a jurisdiction under Rome, an instrument of absorption rather than a genuine model of union between equals. Because Roberson's source is written under Catholic institutional auspices, it documents the Catholic side of the arrangement more directly than the Orthodox objection to it, and an Orthodox statement of the objection in its own terms would be needed alongside it. The disagreement is over how the same historical arrangement should be characterised, absorption or union, which is a question of interpretation rather than of any contested fact about what the arrangement is.
Source The Eastern Christian Churches: A Brief Survey, Ronald G. Roberson