Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences

Divinity Atlas

Disputed Statements

Claims this atlas currently marks as unsettled or as tested and found false. A debated fact is one scholars hold competing positions on; a debunked one has been checked against the record and found not to hold. Both are kept in view rather than quietly smoothed over, with the reasoning that put each one where it stands.

3,338 statements marked Debated.

Ambrosia and Nectar, Origin of the NameNectar has been analysed as a compound of a root meaning death with one meaning to overcome, giving the death overcomer, a formal parallel to ambrotos and amrta

Ambrosia and Nectar, Sacred Objects & Ritual Items

Standing

Concerns Origin of the Name

Currently States Nectar has been analysed as a compound of a root meaning death with one meaning to overcome, giving the death overcomer, a formal parallel to ambrotos and amrta

Ambrosia, the food or drink of immortality in Greek myth, is often analysed as a compound built from a negating prefix and a root meaning mortal or death, parallel to and possibly cognate with the Sanskrit amrita, the drink of immortality in Vedic myth, an equation William Dwight Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar, Including Both the Classical Language and the Older Dialects of Veda and Brahmana (1889) treats as regular and effectively undisputed given the two languages' shared Indo-European ancestry and the words' matching sense and structure. What remains more doubted is the specific reconstruction of ambrosia's own second element within Greek itself, since exactly which Greek root supplies that element and how it developed phonologically has serious philological support from some comparative linguists and has also been doubted by others working from the same Greek evidence. The method is comparative Indo-European philology, reconstructing the shared ancestral form each word descends from and checking each language's derivation against sound-change rules. Because the Greek word's internal etymology is less secure than the cross-linguistic equation, the two claims sit on different evidentiary footing.

Source Sanskrit Grammar, Including Both the Classical Language and the Older Dialects of Veda and Brahmana, William Dwight Whitney

American Civil War, Death Toll Minimum650000.000000

American Civil War, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Minimum

Currently States 650000.000000

The lower bound of J. David Hacker's 2011 census based demographic study, which revised the traditional figure of 620,000 dead upward by roughly twenty percent using survival rates recorded in the 1850, 1860 and 1870 United States censuses. Hacker's most likely single estimate is about 752,000; this atlas records his stated range rather than the point estimate alone.

Source A Census-Based Count of the Civil War Dead (Hacker, 2011), J. David Hacker

American Civil War, Death Toll Maximum850000.000000

American Civil War, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Death Toll Maximum

Currently States 850000.000000

The upper bound of Hacker's 2011 study's own stated range. Roughly two of every three deaths recorded by his method are attributed to disease contracted in the war's crowded and unsanitary camps rather than to combat.

Source A Census-Based Count of the Civil War Dead (Hacker, 2011), J. David Hacker

American Civil War, Displaced (Low Estimate)450000.000000

American Civil War, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Displaced (Low Estimate)

Currently States 450000.000000

The Civil War Monitor's commonly repeated figure of around 500,000 enslaved people who fled bondage toward Union lines between April 1861 and April 1865. No historian or demographic study is named behind the figure, so this atlas records a narrow band around it rather than treating it as a precise count.

Source Contrabands (The Civil War Monitor), The Civil War Monitor editorial staff

American Civil War, Displaced (High Estimate)500000.000000

American Civil War, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Displaced (High Estimate)

Currently States 500000.000000

The upper end of the same commonly repeated figure, around 500,000 enslaved people who fled bondage toward Union lines between April 1861 and April 1865, as reported by the Civil War Monitor. No historian or demographic study is named behind the number, so this atlas records a narrow band rather than a single precise count.

Source Contrabands (The Civil War Monitor), The Civil War Monitor editorial staff

American Samoa, Origin of the NameSamoa is widely explained as sa, sacred, plus moa, center, though linguists regard no single account of the name's origin as settled; American distinguishes the eastern islands administered by the United States from independent Samoa.

American Samoa, States & Territories

Standing

Concerns Origin of the Name

Currently States Samoa is widely explained as sa, sacred, plus moa, center, though linguists regard no single account of the name's origin as settled; American distinguishes the eastern islands administered by the United States from independent Samoa.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference), Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

Americas, TraditionMundane astrology works from national charts here instead, and the several charts proposed for the United States disagree about the rising sign and therefore about almost everything downstream of it.

Americas, Continents

Standing

Concerns Tradition

Currently States Mundane astrology works from national charts here instead, and the several charts proposed for the United States disagree about the rising sign and therefore about almost everything downstream of it.

According To Modern Western astrology

Practitioners hold competing positions on which national chart and which rising sign is correct. The dispute concerns particular nations rather than the continent, and it does not supply a chorographic assignment.

Source A History of Western Astrology, Nicholas Campion

An ࡍ, A Rival System's AttributionThe script's ancestry is assigned either to a cursive form of Aramaic, the derivation favored by most script historians, or to the Parthian chancery script used in Sasanian era administrative documents.

An ࡍ, Alphabet Letters

Standing

Concerns A Rival System's Attribution

Currently States The script's ancestry is assigned either to a cursive form of Aramaic, the derivation favored by most script historians, or to the Parthian chancery script used in Sasanian era administrative documents.

According To The Mandaic script

Both derivations are held in the literature and neither has displaced the other. The Aramaic cursive camp points to the letterforms' overall resemblance to other late Aramaic cursive scripts of the region, including Nabataean and Syriac; the Parthian chancery camp points to specific letterforms, including certain medial and final forms, that resemble Pahlavi documentary hands more closely than any Aramaic cursive exemplar. No single find has settled the question, and Mandaic paleography treats it as open pending further comparative work.

Source Iranian Scripts for Aramaic Languages: The Origin of the Mandaic Script, Charles G. Haberl

An Eastern Liturgical Rite in Full Communion With Rome, Point in DisputeThe arrangement is contested from the Orthodox side, where these churches are often read as an instrument of absorption rather than as a model of union.

An Eastern Liturgical Rite in Full Communion With Rome, Beliefs & Restrictions

Standing

Concerns Point in Dispute

Currently States The arrangement is contested from the Orthodox side, where these churches are often read as an instrument of absorption rather than as a model of union.

The Eastern Catholic churches, Byzantine, Syriac, Armenian, Coptic and East Syriac among them, each keep their own rite, liturgical language, canon law and devotional life while holding the Catholic faith and communion with the bishop of Rome. Ronald Roberson's survey, published by the Pontifical Oriental Institute in Rome, a Catholic institution, presents the arrangement as a model of legitimate diversity within Catholic unity. From the Orthodox side, and this is the substance of the dispute, the same churches are often read differently: as bodies drawn out of Orthodox communion into a jurisdiction under Rome, an instrument of absorption rather than a genuine model of union between equals. Because Roberson's source is written under Catholic institutional auspices, it documents the Catholic side of the arrangement more directly than the Orthodox objection to it, and an Orthodox statement of the objection in its own terms would be needed alongside it. The disagreement is over how the same historical arrangement should be characterised, absorption or union, which is a question of interpretation rather than of any contested fact about what the arrangement is.

Source The Eastern Christian Churches: A Brief Survey, Ronald G. Roberson

An Lushan Rebellion, Religious DimensionAn Lushan was of Sogdian and Turkic descent, and Sogdian merchant networks tied to Central Asian Zoroastrian and Manichaean communities helped finance and staff his rebel army, which is why some popular accounts of history's deadliest wars group this rebellion with religious conflicts. Mainstream Tang historiography instead treats it as a political and military civil war fought over control of the imperial court, attributing to neither side a religious cause or program. Whether the rebellion belongs among history's religious wars at all is the debated fact this atlas records, not a settled classification.

An Lushan Rebellion, Wars & Conflicts

Standing

Concerns Religious Dimension

Currently States An Lushan was of Sogdian and Turkic descent, and Sogdian merchant networks tied to Central Asian Zoroastrian and Manichaean communities helped finance and staff his rebel army, which is why some popular accounts of history's deadliest wars group this rebellion with religious conflicts. Mainstream Tang historiography instead treats it as a political and military civil war fought over control of the imperial court, attributing to neither side a religious cause or program. Whether the rebellion belongs among history's religious wars at all is the debated fact this atlas records, not a settled classification.

Wikipedia's synthesis of Tang era historiography describes the rebellion as a political and military struggle for the throne, naming no religious motive on either side, and notes only An Lushan's Sogdian ancestry and his army's reliance on Sogdian networks elsewhere associated with Zoroastrian and Manichaean communities in Tang China. No academic source consulted argues the fighting itself was waged over religion; this atlas includes the rebellion here because that very ambiguity is itself a documented, debated fact.

Source An Lushan Rebellion (Wikipedia)

Anahita, Point in DisputeWhether Anahita, absent from the Gathas and prominent only from the Achaemenid period onward, represents an older Iranian goddess absorbed into Zoroastrianism or a later development answering a devotional need the early teaching left unmet.

Anahita, Deities

Standing

Concerns Point in Dispute

Currently States Whether Anahita, absent from the Gathas and prominent only from the Achaemenid period onward, represents an older Iranian goddess absorbed into Zoroastrianism or a later development answering a devotional need the early teaching left unmet.

Anahita is entirely absent from the Gathas, the oldest core of the Avesta attributed to Zoroaster himself, and her cult rises to real prominence only later, especially under Artaxerxes II. Scholars are divided over whether she represents an older Iranian goddess absorbed into Zoroastrianism as the faith spread among peoples who already venerated her, or a later development within the tradition answering popular demand for a fertility and water cult the austere early teaching did not provide.

Source A History of Zoroastrianism, Mary Boyce

Anapanasati, Origin Period Start Year-500

Anapanasati, Practices

Standing

Concerns Origin Period Start Year

Currently States -500

Tradition holds this was the Buddha's own practice on the night of his awakening, its own text says, but the Buddha's own dates are genuinely disputed among historians of religion: the traditional long chronology places his life around 563 to 483 BCE, while a revised short chronology favored by some modern scholars places his death closer to 400 BCE, moving the whole dateline by up to a century.

Source The Pali Canon (Tipitaka), Anonymous (Theravada tradition)

Anavah, Origin PeriodThe baraita reached its present textual form by around 200 CE alongside the rest of the Mishnah, though sayings attributed to Rabbi Pinchas ben Yair, active in the second century CE, are held to have circulated earlier in oral form; the Numbers passage it draws on belongs to the much older wilderness narrative.

Anavah, Virtues

Standing

Concerns Origin Period

Currently States The baraita reached its present textual form by around 200 CE alongside the rest of the Mishnah, though sayings attributed to Rabbi Pinchas ben Yair, active in the second century CE, are held to have circulated earlier in oral form; the Numbers passage it draws on belongs to the much older wilderness narrative.

Source The Mishnah: A New Translation, Jacob Neusner, trans.

Ancestor Veneration, Contested or Appropriated Modern UseThe term ancestor worship is rejected by most practitioners and by most current scholarship, on the ground that the dead are not held to be gods and the obligations owed to them are those of kinship.

Ancestor Veneration, Doctrines

Standing

Concerns Contested or Appropriated Modern Use

Currently States The term ancestor worship is rejected by most practitioners and by most current scholarship, on the ground that the dead are not held to be gods and the obligations owed to them are those of kinship.

John S. Mbiti's African Religions and Philosophy (Heinemann, 1969), drawing on his own fieldwork and theological training across East and Central African traditions, records that the term ancestor worship is rejected by most practitioners and by most current scholarship, on the ground that the dead are not held to be gods and the obligations owed to them are those of kinship rather than worship. Mbiti proposed the living dead as a replacement term in the same 1969 study; that term is in turn criticised by later Africanist scholars for imposing a pan-African uniformity the individual traditions do not actually show. No single replacement term has been agreed across the field, and veneration is used in the atlas as the least misleading available option rather than as a settled term of art.

Source African Religions and Philosophy, John S. Mbiti

Ancestral Sin as Inherited Mortality Rather Than Inherited Guilt, Point in DisputeHow far the Eastern and Latin accounts genuinely conflict, and how much of the difference is one of vocabulary and emphasis, is itself argued.

Ancestral Sin as Inherited Mortality Rather Than Inherited Guilt, Beliefs & Restrictions

Standing

Concerns Point in Dispute

Currently States How far the Eastern and Latin accounts genuinely conflict, and how much of the difference is one of vocabulary and emphasis, is itself argued.

The Eastern and Oriental Orthodox churches teach that Adam's descendants inherit mortality and a nature bent toward sin, but not the guilt of his act itself, which they hold to be personal and non-transferable; the Latin tradition, following Augustine, has instead spoken of an inherited state of sin removed by baptism. John Meyendorff's standard survey of Orthodox theology traces how this difference in starting point reaches into further disagreements, over the meaning of baptism, over the nature of grace, and over the Latin doctrine of Mary's immaculate conception, which addresses a problem the Eastern framework does not pose in the same terms. How far the two accounts genuinely conflict, rather than expressing the same underlying conviction in different theological vocabularies shaped by Greek and Latin patristic traditions respectively, is itself argued among theologians on both sides. The question has not been settled because it depends on how much weight is given to vocabulary versus substance in comparing two theological traditions that developed largely independently of each other after the early centuries.

Source Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes, John Meyendorff

Ancilia, NumberTwelve (one heaven-fallen, eleven copies)

Ancilia, Artifacts & Relics

Standing

Concerns Number

Currently States Twelve (one heaven-fallen, eleven copies)

Mary Beard, John North and Simon Price's Religions of Rome, Volume 1: A History (Cambridge University Press, 1998) examine the Roman tradition of the ancilia, the sacred shields of Mars. Their method is comparative source-critical history, distinguishing the single shield said to have fallen from heaven under King Numa, which they treat as legendary, from the eleven copies Numa reportedly commissioned to protect the original by making it indistinguishable, which the authors record as attested cult objects carried by the Salian priests in historical Roman ritual down to the historical period.

Source Religions of Rome, Volume 1: A History, Mary Beard, John North and Simon Price

Andrei Rublev, Lifespan or Floruit Start Year1360

Andrei Rublev, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit Start Year

Currently States 1360

No record of Rublev's birth survives. Scholarship on the Trinity icon reconstructs his working life from monastic and chronicle references to his activity, and generally places his birth somewhere in the 1360s, a range rather than a fixed year; 1360 is recorded here as the commonly cited outer edge of that range.

Source The Rublev Trinity: The Icon of the Trinity by the Monk-painter Andrei Rublev (Gabriel Bunge), Gabriel Bunge

Andrei Rublev, Lifespan or Floruit End Year1428

Andrei Rublev, Historical Figures

Standing

Concerns Lifespan or Floruit End Year

Currently States 1428

Chronicle references to Rublev's death cluster around 1427 to 1430, without full agreement on the exact year; the State Tretyakov Gallery's own dating of the Trinity icon to 1422 to 1427 places its creation late in his life, consistent with a death shortly after. 1428 is recorded here as the commonly cited midpoint of that range rather than a fixed date.

Source The Rublev Trinity: The Icon of the Trinity by the Monk-painter Andrei Rublev (Gabriel Bunge), Gabriel Bunge

Anglican Communion, Standing of Holy OrdersHistoric Episcopate Locally Adapted

Anglican Communion, Denominations

Standing

Concerns Standing of Holy Orders

Currently States Historic Episcopate Locally Adapted

The claim is disputed from both sides. Leo XIII held Anglican orders absolutely null and utterly void in Apostolicae Curae in 1896 and the archbishops of Canterbury and York answered in Saepius Officio in 1897. Since provinces began ordaining women, some Anglican provinces no longer recognise each other's orders either.

Source The Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral, The Lambeth Conference

Anglicanism, Adherents Today Minimum80000000.000000

Anglicanism, Denominations

Standing

Concerns Adherents Today Minimum

Currently States 80000000.000000

Estimates range from roughly 80 million, close to Pew Research's dedicated 2008 estimate and a commonly cited Anglican Communion figure, up to 100-110 million in broader countings that include every denomination within the wider Anglican tradition. There is no single official worldwide census.

Source Global Anglicanism at a Crossroads (Pew Research Center, 2008), Pew Research Center