Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Gilgul

Also Known As Gilgul neshamot · transmigration of soulsOriginal Term gilgul (Hebrew, rolling, or cycling)
Action, Rebirth and Consequence

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1150 to 1572

Transmigration appears first in Jewish sources in the twelfth-century book Bahir and is fully developed in the Zohar and then in Lurianic Kabbalah, where individual souls are traced through named historical figures and a person's obligations may derive from a previous life. It supplied answers to problems the tradition otherwise handled badly, why the righteous suffer, what happens to a soul that died before completing its work, why the childless brother's widow marries into the family, which Lurianic sources read as returning the soul to the line. Saadia Gaon dismissed it as nonsense and Maimonides ignored it entirely; it never entered the philosophical mainstream and has no place in the standard codes. It is nevertheless normal in Hasidic and Sephardi mystical thought, widely assumed in Kabbalah-influenced popular piety, and absent or denied in most of the modern movements.

Facts
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Genuinely disputed within this tradition 1Tradition: Judaism
Accepted in Kabbalah and Hasidism
Status Within the Tradition
Rejected, or not held, within this tradition 1Tradition: Judaism
Origins
Origin Period
1150 to 1572 1
Held By
Judaism (Kabbalah) 1
Learn More
The Rolling of Souls, Admitted Late

Gilgul neshamot, the rolling or cycling of souls, is the Jewish doctrine of reincarnation. It is not found in the Hebrew Bible or in the Talmud, and medieval Jewish rationalism rejected it: Saadia Gaon, in Beliefs and Opinions, dismissed it explicitly as a notion imported from outside. Its entry into Jewish thought is by way of Kabbalah, first attested in the twelfth-century Sefer ha-Bahir, developed in the Zohar, and made central by the Lurianic school of sixteenth-century Safed.

In the Lurianic system, set out in Hayyim Vital's Sha'ar ha-Gilgulim, souls return in order to complete commandments left undone, to repair damage done in an earlier life, or to be matched to circumstances that permit a specific rectification. A related mechanism, ibbur (impregnation), has an additional soul temporarily join a living person to accomplish a particular task or to assist them. Hasidism absorbed the whole doctrine, and it lies behind the popular figure of the dybbuk, a soul that has failed to move on and attaches itself to the living.

Its standing in Judaism has never been that of a required belief. It is widely accepted in Hasidic and kabbalistically inclined Orthodox circles, treated as an optional or non-operative view in much of Modern Orthodoxy, and generally not held in Reform, Conservative or Reconstructionist Judaism. Comparisons with Indian doctrines of rebirth are frequently drawn but the differences are substantial: gilgul is not governed by a general law of moral causation of the kind karma describes, is often held to be limited in number, and does not displace the resurrection of the dead as the tradition's ultimate horizon.

The Dybbuk: Gilgul Gone Wrong, on Stage and in Testimony

Where gilgul in its constructive form describes a soul returning to complete or repair something, the dybbuk, literally "attachment" or "clinging," describes the doctrine's darker counterpart: a wandering or unsettled soul that fails to move on after death and instead attaches itself to and speaks through a living person, understood as possession requiring exorcism.

Early modern Jewish communities, particularly in sixteenth and seventeenth-century Safed and later Eastern Europe, produced documented accounts of dybbuk cases and of the rabbis called to perform exorcisms, typically through prayer, the blowing of a shofar, and formal adjuration commanding the spirit to depart through the smallest toe, on the reasoning that a soul should leave the body causing the least damage; a number of these accounts were recorded and circulated as cautionary and edifying literature, presenting the phenomenon as evidence of divine justice rather than mere superstition.

The concept reached its widest audience through S. An-sky's play The Dybbuk, written in the early twentieth century and first performed in 1920, in which the soul of a dead young man, denied marriage to his beloved in life, possesses her on the eve of her wedding to another, drawing directly on the folklore and exorcism rituals of the Pale of Settlement's shtetl culture that An-sky had documented as an ethnographer. The play became a foundational work of modern Yiddish theater and, through later adaptations in film and drama, the primary channel through which the dybbuk, and a popularized image of gilgul generally, became familiar to audiences with no connection to the kabbalistic tradition that originated it.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Judaism, Religions
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Related To

Sources
1. Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism
Gershom Scholem, Schocken Books, 1961On transmigration in the Bahir, the Zohar and Lurianic KabbalahView the Source
The Zohar
Traditionally attributed to Moses de LeonOn the transmigration of soulsView the Source
Physician of the Soul, Healer of the Cosmos: Isaac Luria and His Kabbalistic Fellowship
Lawrence Fine, Stanford University Press, 2003On gilgul and ibbur in the Lurianic systemView the Source
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.