Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
I Ching Hexagrams

Youthful Folly

MUNG
Meng

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1000 BCE to 350 BCE

King Wen hexagram 4, Youthful Folly or Inexperience (Meng), places the Mountain above Water: a dangerous spring welling up at the foot of a mountain, halted and not yet knowing its course, an image of youthful ignorance that must be taught. It describes inexperience and the process of learning and instruction. Its Judgment says youthful folly has success, but that it is not the teacher who seeks the young fool, rather the young fool who seeks the teacher; at the first oracle one is answered, but importuning again and again is troublesome, and the troublesome one is not answered; perseverance furthers. Its Image counsels the superior person to be thorough in all they do and so to foster their character. As a reading it marks a situation of inexperience, teaching that one should humbly seek guidance, take the answer given seriously, and cultivate steady, thorough habits rather than pestering for repeated reassurance.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1000 BCE to 350 BCE 1Tradition: Zhou Yi, the Western Zhou divination core
Origin Period
1924 to 1950 2Tradition: Wilhelm-Baynes I Ching (1950)
Origin Period
400 BCE to 100 BCE 3Tradition: Zhou Yi and the Ten Wings
Origin Period
This hexagram's dating spans three distinct historical layers: the divinatory judgment text of the Zhouyi core, composed in the early Western Zhou around 1000 BCE and recovered in the Mawangdui silk manuscripts; the Ten Wings commentary tradition that gave the hexagrams their later philosophical reading, compiled across the Warring States and Han periods by around 400 BCE; and the English title used here, coined in Richard Wilhelm's 1924 German translation and carried into English by Cary Baynes. 2
Attributed Author / Compiler
By tradition: the hexagram statements to King Wen of Zhou, the line statements to the Duke of Zhou, and the Ten Wings to Confucius. 3Tradition: Zhou Yi and the Ten Wings
Attributed Author / Compiler
No named author. The core is a Western Zhou compilation with no compiler on record, and the ascription of the Ten Wings to Confucius was already being questioned inside the Chinese tradition by the eleventh century and is defended by no current scholarship. 3
Language
Classical Chinese 4
Identity
King Wen Number
1
Native Name
Meng 1
Attributions
Trigram Pairing
Mountain over Water 1
Order
Position in the Sequence
2Tradition: King Wen sequence, the received order
Position in the Sequence
47 2Tradition: Xiantian (Earlier Heaven) arrangement of Shao Yong
Learn More
The Book's Own Rule About Asking Twice

Hexagram 4 contains the clearest instruction the I Ching gives about how it should be used, and it is embedded in the judgement rather than in any commentary.

The text says, in substance, that it is not the teacher who seeks the young and inexperienced but the young who seek the teacher; that at the first consultation an answer is given; and that to ask a second and a third time is importunity, and importunity receives no answer. Wilhelm renders the operative word as importunity; Legge's 1882 version is close; other translations use pestering, or simply say the oracle will not speak twice.

This is the text legislating for its own use, and it is remarkable for coming from the oldest layer rather than from a later commentator anxious about misuse. Whatever the Zhou diviners thought they were doing, they thought it could be spoiled by repetition.

The rule is still observed in most serious practice and routinely ignored elsewhere. It has an obvious practical justification, a questioner who consults repeatedly is not consulting but shopping, and an equally obvious tension with the fact that circumstances change and a question asked in March is not the question asked in June. Practitioners resolve this in different ways, generally by distinguishing a genuinely new situation from a refusal to accept the first answer.

The hexagram's name, Meng, refers to something covered, obscured or immature, and the folly it describes is not stupidity but inexperience that has not yet recognised itself.

Teaching, and Being Taught

Read as a situation rather than a rule, this hexagram describes the condition of not yet knowing enough, and its interest lies in how unsentimental it is about that.

The line texts include the discipline of a fool, the use of fetters, and a warning against a repeated punishment that becomes humiliation rather than instruction. The Wilhelm rendering keeps this severity. It is not a hexagram about gentle mentorship; it is about the correction of somebody who needs correcting, delivered by somebody entitled to deliver it.

In practice the reading runs in two directions depending on where the querent stands. If they are the student, the counsel is to accept instruction, to stop improvising, and to recognise that the situation calls for learning rather than initiative. If they are the teacher, the counsel is stricter: to wait to be asked, to answer once, and to refuse the role of chasing after someone who has not sought it.

The second reading is the one the judgement actually supports, and it is frequently skipped in popular treatments, which prefer the encouraging student-facing version.

The hexagram inverts to Difficulty at the Beginning, and the pairing is instructive: one figure describes a start that is tangled, the other a start that is uninformed. Both belong to the opening movement of the King Wen sequence, which spends its first several figures on the various ways a thing can go wrong at the outset before it gets anywhere near success. That is not pessimism; it is a book compiled by people whose questions were mostly about risk.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Corresponds To

Channel of Logic bridges Hexagram 4, Youthful Folly, and Hexagram 63, After Completion, per its own iching-correspondence fact; this edge names the 4 side.

Source The Human Design SystemRa Uru Hu (Alan Robert Krakower)

Human Design Gate 4, Formulating Answers, corresponds to Hexagram 4, Youthful Folly, per its own iching-correspondence fact.

Source The Human Design SystemRa Uru Hu (Alan Robert Krakower)

Gene Key 4, From Intolerance to Forgiveness, corresponds to Hexagram 4, Youthful Folly, per its own iching-correspondence fact.

Disciplines That Use This

I Ching, Disciplines

The sixty four hexagrams of the Zhou Yi.

Source Zhouyi: The Book of ChangesRichard Rutt (trans.)

Originates in Language

Source Zhouyi: The Book of ChangesRichard Rutt (trans.)

Reached by Changing Lines

Sources
1. I Ching: The Classic of Changes, translated with an introduction and commentary, the first English translation of the newly discovered second-century BC Mawangdui texts
Edward L. Shaughnessy (trans.), Ballantine Books, 1996On the dating and composition of the Zhou Yi core
2. Fathoming the Cosmos and Ordering the World: The Yijing (I Ching, or Classic of Changes) and Its Evolution in China
Richard J. Smith, University of Virginia Press, 2008On Shao Yong's xiantian ordering of the sixty-four hexagramsView the Source
3. The Five "Confucian" Classics
Michael Nylan, Yale University Press, 2001On the authorship question and the critique of the traditional ascriptionsView the Source
4. Zhouyi: The Book of Changes
Richard Rutt (trans.), Curzon Press, 1996Introduction, on the language of the core textView the Source
The I Ching, or Book of Changes
Richard Wilhelm (trans.); Cary F. Baynes (English trans.), Princeton University Press, 1980Hexagram 4, the Judgement, on repeated consultationView the Source
The Sacred Books of the East, Volume XVI: The Yi King
James Legge (trans.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1882Legge's rendering of the same passageView the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.