Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sacred Sites

Chi'chil Bildagoteel (Oak Flat)

Western Apache Sites

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

An oak-studded basin on the Tonto National Forest east of Superior, Arizona, at the head of a canyon system. The Western Apache name, Chi'chil Bildagoteel, refers to the emory oaks that grow there. It is a place of ceremony for San Carlos Apache and other Apache people, and also of acorn gathering, medicinal plants and burials. It has been a public campground and a well-known climbing area at the same time, which is part of why its destruction became a national argument. The Apache organisations fighting for it have been explicit that their case does not depend on outsiders being told what happens there, and this entry does not tell them.

Facts
Geography
Latitude
33.3 degrees north 2
Approximate reference point, rounded to one decimal place; this marks the site's general location for a map, not a survey-grade or precise boundary measurement.
Longitude
111 degrees west 2
Approximate reference point, rounded to one decimal place; this marks the site's general location for a map, not a survey-grade or precise boundary measurement.
Attributions
Tradition
Western Apache 1
Site
Type of Site
Sacred landscape or country 1
Type of Site Detail
National Forest land in Arizona determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places as a traditional cultural property of the San Carlos Apache and other Apache peoples, presently the subject of federal litigation over its transfer for underground copper mining. 2
Origins
Country
United States 1
Region
North America 1
Status
Status Today
In active religious use 1
Status Today
Control of or access to the site is contested 1
UNESCO World Heritage
Not Inscribed 3
Confirmed absent from the United States' 27 inscribed World Heritage sites and 16 tentative-list entries, verified live 2026-08-06.
Cultural Restriction
Restricted Tradition
The Apache organisations that have fought to protect Oak Flat as a place of ceremony have been explicit, including in their own federal court filings, that their case does not depend on outsiders being told what happens there. The atlas records that the site is used for ceremony and does not set out what the ceremony is. 1
Location
Location of Chi'chil Bildagoteel (Oak Flat) Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Polynesia Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guam Guatemala Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kuwait Laos Latvia Lebanon Libya Lithuania Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritius Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tanzania Thailand Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican City Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
Learn More
The Exchange, and What Counts as a Burden

Oak Flat was not sold, condemned or litigated away. It was attached.

Section 3003 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, titled the Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act, was added to a defence bill shortly before the vote and signed in December 2014. It directs the Forest Service to convey roughly 2,400 acres including Oak Flat to Resolution Copper, a Rio Tinto and BHP venture. The mine is a block-cave operation: ore is undercut and allowed to collapse, and the collapse propagates upward, so the expected result at the surface is a subsidence crater. The same measure had been introduced and had failed as a standalone bill repeatedly since 2005.

In 2016 the area was listed on the National Register of Historic Places as the Chi'chil Bildagoteel Historic District, a traditional cultural property. The United States therefore holds, on its own records, both that the place is religiously significant and that it is to be destroyed.

The substantial-burden question

Apache Stronghold sued in 2021 under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Treaty of Santa Fe of 1852. Sitting en banc in March 2024, the Ninth Circuit held that destroying the site would not impose a substantial burden on Apache religious exercise as that Act defines it. The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal on 27 May 2025. Related challenges brought by the San Carlos Apache Tribe and by a coalition including the Inter Tribal Association of Arizona continued into 2026, with a published Ninth Circuit opinion on 13 March 2026, amended on 8 April.

The reasoning follows a line running back through the San Francisco Peaks case and, before it, to the Supreme Court's 1988 decision on a logging road through sacred ground in northern California. A burden on religion, in this line of cases, means being coerced into violating a belief or penalised for holding one. Losing the place where the religion is practised is neither. No court in this sequence has doubted that the sites are sacred; the finding has consistently been that sacredness is not the kind of fact the statute operates on.

What happens at Oak Flat is not described here. The Apache organisations contesting the mine have made a point of the fact that their case does not require outsiders to be told, and there is no reason for a reference work to be the exception.

A Ceremony Tied to This Ground

Oak Flat hosts a coming-of-age ceremony that cannot be relocated without changing what it is, which is the crux of the objection to mining underneath it.

A ceremony tied to this ground

Western Apache communities hold the Sunrise Ceremony, a multi-day coming-of-age rite for young women, at Oak Flat among other locations, along with gathering of acorns from the site's Emory oak groves and collection of medicinal plants used in ceremonial and everyday practice. Apache Stronghold, the group leading legal opposition to mining at the site, describes the ceremony's connection to this specific ground as central to its meaning, not incidental to it, a claim the dispute has turned on directly rather than being a detail to instruct outsiders in here.

What block caving would do

Resolution Copper, a joint venture involving Rio Tinto, plans to extract ore using block caving, a method that undermines rock at depth and lets the ground above collapse into the void created, which independent assessments project would eventually produce a crater roughly two miles across and hundreds of feet deep directly over the site.

Still in court

Apache Stronghold's challenge, arguing the mine violates religious freedom protections, has moved through federal appeals courts with mixed rulings, and the land exchange enabling the mine remains contested rather than fully resolved, meaning the ceremony's future at this specific location is an open legal question rather than a settled one.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Chi'chil Bildagoteel is a Western Apache sacred place whose religious standing the tribes have asserted in the federal courts. It previously reached the restricted closure only through related-to links to other sites.

Source Apache Stronghold v. United States, en banc opinion of the Ninth CircuitUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Contained In

Related To

Two contested public-land cases in the American Southwest in which the nations holding the place have gone to law and to Congress over its destruction or reduction.

In both cases the nation holding the place has declined to publish its ceremonial content and has said its claim does not depend on outsiders being told. The atlas follows that position on both entries.

Source Apache Stronghold v. United States, en banc opinion of the Ninth CircuitUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Both are places in Arizona that Apache and other nations hold sacred, and federal decisions affecting both have been litigated in the Ninth Circuit.

Source Apache Stronghold v. United States, en banc opinion of the Ninth CircuitUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Sources
1. Apache Stronghold v. United States, en banc opinion of the Ninth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2024En banc, March 2024; certiorari denied 27 May 2025View the Source
2. Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)
Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024View the Source
3. UNESCO World Heritage List
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO World Heritage CentreView the Source
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, section 3003 (Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act)
United States Congress, United States Government Publishing Office, 2014Section 3003View the Source
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States Forest Service, No. 25-5189
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2026Opinion 13 March 2026, amended 8 April 2026View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.