Oak Flat was not sold, condemned or litigated away. It was attached.
Section 3003 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, titled the Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act, was added to a defence bill shortly before the vote and signed in December 2014. It directs the Forest Service to convey roughly 2,400 acres including Oak Flat to Resolution Copper, a Rio Tinto and BHP venture. The mine is a block-cave operation: ore is undercut and allowed to collapse, and the collapse propagates upward, so the expected result at the surface is a subsidence crater. The same measure had been introduced and had failed as a standalone bill repeatedly since 2005.
In 2016 the area was listed on the National Register of Historic Places as the Chi'chil Bildagoteel Historic District, a traditional cultural property. The United States therefore holds, on its own records, both that the place is religiously significant and that it is to be destroyed.
The substantial-burden question
Apache Stronghold sued in 2021 under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Treaty of Santa Fe of 1852. Sitting en banc in March 2024, the Ninth Circuit held that destroying the site would not impose a substantial burden on Apache religious exercise as that Act defines it. The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal on 27 May 2025. Related challenges brought by the San Carlos Apache Tribe and by a coalition including the Inter Tribal Association of Arizona continued into 2026, with a published Ninth Circuit opinion on 13 March 2026, amended on 8 April.
The reasoning follows a line running back through the San Francisco Peaks case and, before it, to the Supreme Court's 1988 decision on a logging road through sacred ground in northern California. A burden on religion, in this line of cases, means being coerced into violating a belief or penalised for holding one. Losing the place where the religion is practised is neither. No court in this sequence has doubted that the sites are sacred; the finding has consistently been that sacredness is not the kind of fact the statute operates on.
What happens at Oak Flat is not described here. The Apache organisations contesting the mine have made a point of the fact that their case does not require outsiders to be told, and there is no reason for a reference work to be the exception.