Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scholarly Disciplines

Old Iranian Philology

Humanities

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1833

The comparative grammatical study of Avestan and Old Persian, opened by Eugene Burnouf's 1833 analysis of the Yasna. Distinguishes the archaic Gathas attributed to Zoroaster from the linguistically later Younger Avestan material surrounding them.

Facts
Method
Method
grammatical and textual analysis of Old Avestan and Old Persian sources, reconstructed and cross referenced against related Indo-Iranian and wider Indo-European languages 2
Subject
Subject
the language of the Avesta and the Old Persian royal inscriptions, and what that language can establish about the date and layered transmission of Zoroastrian scripture 2
Identity
Field Category
Humanities 1
Parent Field
Philology 1
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1833 2
Learn More
Burnouf Turns From Buddhist Manuscripts to the Avesta

Old Iranian philology studies the language of the Avesta, the Zoroastrian scripture, and of the Old Persian royal inscriptions, reconstructing their grammar through comparison with related Indo-Iranian and wider Indo-European languages. Eugène Burnouf, the same scholar who founded Buddhist studies, turned to the Avesta in the early 1830s and published his Commentaire sur le Yaçna in 1833, subjecting Abraham Hyacinthe Anquetil-Duperron's pioneering but linguistically uncertain 1771 translation to the first rigorous comparative grammatical analysis, correcting many of its readings and giving Old Iranian philology a properly linguistic foundation.

The Avesta was transmitted orally for many centuries before being committed to writing, and Old Iranian philology's central achievement is distinguishing the archaic Old Avestan language of the Gathas, the hymns tradition attributes directly to Zoroaster, from the linguistically later Younger Avestan of the surrounding liturgical material. That linguistic layering is the primary evidence for what within Zoroastrian scripture may plausibly reach back toward Zoroaster's own lifetime, distinct from the substantial younger material that later tradition treats as equally ancient, and the atlas follows that distinction wherever it dates a specific Zoroastrian teaching.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Persians, Cultures

This source names Persians directly: "The comparative grammatical study of Avestan and Old Persian, opened by Eugene Burnouf's 1833 analysis of the Yasna."

Zarathustra, Figures

This source names Zarathustra directly: "Distinguishes the archaic Gathas attributed to Zoroaster from the linguistically later Younger Avestan material surrounding them."

Branch Of

Open Questions Needing This

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.