Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Transcendent in America: Hindu-Inspired Meditation Movements as New Religion

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Lola Williamson is a scholar of new religious movements, and this New York University Press monograph is her scholarly study of Transcendental Meditation and comparable Hindu-inspired meditation movements as a distinct category of new religion in America, including their initiation ceremonies and the secrecy historically attached to the personally assigned mantra. Its strength is that it treats these movements as a serious object of religious studies rather than dismissing them as merely therapeutic techniques. This atlas cites it here only for the documented access rule around the mantra, never for any content. Its limit is that it is a study of the American reception of these movements specifically, not of their Indian sources.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by New York University Press as Lola Williamson's scholarly study of Hindu-inspired new religious movements, peer reviewed university press scholarship.
Notes
Scholarly study of Transcendental Meditation and comparable movements, including the initiation ceremony and the secrecy attached to the assigned mantra. Cited here only for the access rule, never for any content.
Citation
Author
Lola Williamson
Publisher
New York University Press
Publication Year
2010
Source Type
Monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Americas, Continents

This source names Americas directly: "Lola Williamson is a scholar of new religious movements, and this New York University Press monograph is her scholarly study of Transcendental Meditation and comparable Hindu-inspired meditation..."

New York, Cities

This source names New York directly: "of new religious movements, and this New York University Press monograph is her scholarly study of Transcendental Meditation and comparable Hindu-inspired meditation movements as a distinct category..."

Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)

This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Disciplines, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Mantras, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Subcategories, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Subtle Energies, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.