Enneagram Types
The Helper
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1916 to 1949
Type Two, the Helper (also called the Giver), is one of the nine Enneagram personality types. The Two is caring, warm, generous, and attuned to the needs of others, reaching for connection and love through service and being needed. Its basic fear is of being unwanted or unworthy of love, and its basic desire is to feel loved and to be wanted for itself. Its characteristic vice or passion is pride (the hidden belief that it is indispensable and needs nothing itself), and its balancing virtue is humility. The Two belongs to the Heart or Feeling triad, whose central issue is identity and image, and it sits between the One and Three wings. Under growth (integration) the Two moves toward the self-nurturing and creative honesty of the healthy Four; under stress (disintegration) it takes on the domineering and demanding quality of the unhealthy Eight.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period1916 to 1949 2Tradition: The enneagram symbol (G. I. Gurdjieff) Origin Period1971 to 1975 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Origin PeriodHe taught the scheme in Chile through the later 1960s and formally from his Arica Institute from 1970, mapping nine ego-fixations onto Gurdjieff's figure 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Origin PeriodThe nine types are Oscar Ichazo's 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Origin PeriodThis is the moment the personality system comes into existence and there is no earlier one 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Place of OriginArica in northern Chile, and then Berkeley, California 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Place of OriginMoscow and Saint Petersburg, where Gurdjieff was teaching in 1916, and then Constantinople and Fontainebleau, where the work continued after the revolution. 2Tradition: The enneagram symbol (G. I. Gurdjieff) Place of OriginThe system is South American and North American in equal measure and belongs to the countercultural psychology of the years around 1970 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Creator / OriginatorOscar Ichazo, who made the nine-type scheme and attached it to Gurdjieff's figure, and Claudio Naranjo, whose psychological elaboration is the version the later literature descends from. Both are named, both are recent, and neither claim is disputed by anyone who has looked at the record. 2 Origin of the Name"Enneagram" is Greek: ennea, nine, and gramma, a figure or a thing drawn. The word names the DIAGRAM and nothing else. Its transfer to a nine-type personality theory happened in the twentieth century and is the source of most of the confusion about the system's age, a reader told that the enneagram is old is being told something true about a shape and something false about a typology. 2Tradition: The enneagram symbol (G. I. Gurdjieff) Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryUsed, but its validity as a comparative category is disputed 3 Debunked
Attributed Author / CompilerPopular writing traces the system to a Sarmoung Brotherhood in central Asia, to Sufi masters, to the desert fathers, to Pythagoras. No independent evidence for the Sarmoung Brotherhood exists; Gurdjieff's account of visiting it is read even by sympathetic scholars as teaching narrative, not reportage; no Sufi order used the figure this way; and the figure is not attested before Gurdjieff. 2Tradition: The enneagram symbol (G. I. Gurdjieff) Carole M. Cusack's article "The Enneagram: G. I. Gurdjieff's Esoteric Symbol" (Aries: Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism, vol. 20, no. 1, Brill, 2020, pp. 31-54) traces the nine-pointed figure to George Gurdjieff's own early twentieth-century teaching and examines the lineage claims later attached to it, that it descends from a Sarmoung Brotherhood, from Sufi masters, from the Christian desert fathers, or from Pythagoras. Checking each claim against the documentary record, Cusack finds no independent evidence a Sarmoung Brotherhood existed, no Sufi order that used the figure this way, and no attestation of the symbol earlier than Gurdjieff's own circle. The personality-typing use of the enneagram, distinct from Gurdjieff's own geometric teaching, was added later still, by Oscar Ichazo and Claudio Naranjo in the 1960s and 1970s. On that documentary record the ancient-lineage claim is not historical. Attributions
Wing TypesSourced to the subject's own accountType Two's two possible wings are One (the Reformer, giving 2w1) and Three (the Achiever, giving 2w3). 1 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceIn Gurdjieff's own teaching the figure is a diagram of how any process unfolds: a circle divided by nine points, carrying the law of three and the law of seven, with the inner lines showing where a process must be fed from outside if it is not to run down. It describes events, not people. Nothing in it identifies a type, and no published student of Gurdjieff attaches one. 2Tradition: The enneagram symbol (G. I. Gurdjieff) Meaning in the Attesting SourceThe passion Ichazo gives type Two is PRIDE, superbia, the vice the Latin tradition ranked first and often treated as the root of the rest rather than one item in a list. Its demotion to one of nine parallel passions is a consequence of the scheme, not of the tradition. 2Tradition: Enneagram of personality (Ichazo and Naranjo) Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseVery widely used and very thinly evidenced, and both halves are true. A systematic review of 104 samples found the subscales relate to established measures as the theory predicts, but that factor analyses typically recover FEWER THAN NINE factors and that no study derives the nine types by clustering. It is not a validated instrument and must not be used for hiring or clinical decisions. 3 Learn More
Type Two in the System
Type Two, the Helper or Giver, is placed in the heart or feeling triad with Three and Four, and its core emotional material is therefore shame. The system gives it a basic desire to be loved and wanted, and a basic fear of being unwanted or unworthy of love. Its passion is pride, understood in the specific sense the system gives it, an inflation of one's own indispensability to others and an inability to acknowledge one's own needs, and its virtue is humility. Its wings are One and Three. Under stress the system places Two at Eight, becoming demanding and openly aggressive when the giving is not reciprocated; in growth it moves to Four, becoming able to recognise and own its own feelings and needs rather than living through other people's.
In the Hornevian groups, Riso and Hudson's second classification drawn from Karen Horney's three neurotic trends, Two falls among the compliant types that move toward others, alongside One and Six, since the giving the type is known for is itself a strategy for securing love and approval. This grouping tracks interpersonal strategy rather than the core emotion the heart triad tracks, and the two schemes are not the same classification under different names.
Naranjo, Esalen and the Route into America
The route by which this material reached the English-speaking world runs through Claudio Naranjo (1932-2019), a Chilean psychiatrist who went to Arica in 1970 with a group of Americans, learned Ichazo's system, and then taught his own elaboration of it in Berkeley from the early 1970s in small groups known as SAT, drawing on Gestalt therapy, psychoanalytic character theory and his own clinical observation. Naranjo's protoanalysis connected the nine types to the character types of psychiatric literature, particularly the work of Karen Horney and Wilhelm Reich, and it is his version rather than Ichazo's that most later authors developed. Naranjo asked his students not to publish; several did, and the resulting dispute, including litigation between Ichazo's institute and later authors, is part of the system's documented history.
Naranjo asked those he trained not to publish his teaching, but the request did not hold. Helen Palmer, one of his Berkeley students, published The Enneagram: Understanding Yourself and the Others in Your Life in 1988, the book that carried the system to a mass audience and prompted Ichazo's Arica Institute to sue her and her publisher, Harper and Row, for copyright infringement. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed judgment against Arica in 1992, in Arica Institute, Inc. v. Palmer, holding that Palmer's book did not unlawfully copy protected expression from Ichazo's own materials, only ideas that copyright does not protect; the case remains the clearest documented dispute the system's move into print provoked.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Disciplines That Use This
Disintegrates Toward
Riso-Hudson stress/disintegration direction: Type Two moves toward the unhealthy qualities of Type Eight.
Disintegration Point For
Riso-Hudson stress/disintegration direction: Type Four moves toward the unhealthy qualities of Type Two.
Integrates Toward
Riso-Hudson growth/integration direction: Type Two moves toward the healthy qualities of Type Four.
Integration Point For
Riso-Hudson growth/integration direction: Type Eight moves toward the healthy qualities of Type Two.
Sources
1. Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987Type Two, the Helper
1. Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987Integrates Toward: The Individualist
1. Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987Disintegrates Toward: The Challenger
1. Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987Disintegration Point For: The Individualist
1. Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987Integration Point For: The Challenger
2. The Enneagram: G. I. Gurdjieff's Esoteric Symbol
Carole M. Cusack, Aries: Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism 20, no. 1 (Brill), pp. 31-54, 2020on Arica and on the Berkeley groupsView the Source 3. The Enneagram: A systematic review of the literature and directions for future research
Joshua N. Hook, Todd W. Hall, Don E. Davis, Daryl R. Van Tongeren and Mackenzie Conner, Journal of Clinical Psychology, volume 77 number 4, 2021the review's conclusions and its cautions on applied useView the Source Character and Neurosis: An Integrative View
Claudio Naranjo, Gateways/IDHHB, 1994protoanalysis and the character types
Essays About This Entity (2 essays)
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.