Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Targeting the Readership for a Ming Publication: Comprehensiveness in the Compendium for the Expert Physiognomist

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is a peer-reviewed journal article in Asia Major, published by the Institute of History and Philology at Academia Sinica, and its documented, checkable contribution is a study of the Shenxiang quanbian, a mid Ming compendium scholars themselves acknowledge as the single most important Chinese reference work for body divination, citing a specific 1602 Newly Published Capital Edition rather than describing the work at second hand. This record states its own limit plainly: it is a single journal article rather than a full monograph, so a broader claim about Chinese physiognomy beyond what this specific article traces needs a more extensive dedicated source. Use it for the documented readership and textual context of this specific Ming compendium.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published in Asia Major, a peer reviewed journal for East Asian studies, Mei Chun's scholarly article on Ming-era physiognomy publishing.
Notes
Asia Major, third series, vol. 29, no. 1, 2016, pp. 73 to 100. Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Taipei. Studies the Shenxiang quanbian, the mid Ming compendium acknowledged by scholars as the single most important Chinese reference work for body divination, and cites a 1602 Newly Published Capital Edition.
Citation
Author
Mei Chun
Publisher
Asia Major
Publication Year
2016
URL
https://www11.ihp.sinica.edu.tw/storage/w2_file/2746EpRBVJN.pdf
Source Type
Journal article
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Asia, Continents

This source names Asia directly: "is a peer-reviewed journal article in Asia Major, published by the Institute of History and Philology at Academia Sinica, and its documented, checkable contribution is a study of the Shenxiang..."

Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)

This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 25 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Face Regions, 25 claims: 25 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.