Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Redemption

Also Known As Ransoming · buying backOriginal Term apolytrosis (Greek); geulah (Hebrew)
Salvation and Liberation

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1000 BCE to 1600 CE

The root sense is economic. To redeem is to buy back: to recover a pledged field, to free a slave by payment, to discharge an obligation by handing over the price. Both traditions take the word from that setting, and the metaphor keeps its grip long after the setting is forgotten.

In the Hebrew Bible the redeemer is often a person, the kinsman with the duty and the right to buy back a relative's land or freedom, which is the legal machinery the book of Ruth turns on. Extended to God, the paradigm act of redemption is the exodus: the deliverance of a people from slavery, historical and collective. Jewish usage keeps that emphasis. Redemption is something that happens to Israel and, in the messianic expectation, to the world; it is public rather than interior, and it is not yet complete.

Christian usage narrowed it toward the individual and toward sin, taking the price paid to be the death of Christ and the bondage to be sin rather than Egypt. That shift is not a mistranslation but a genuine change of referent, and it is one of the places where the two traditions read the same vocabulary in different registers, one historical and communal, one moral and personal. Any account of redemption that presents the Christian sense as the meaning of the Hebrew word has quietly discarded the exodus.

The unanswerable question the metaphor generates is who receives the price, and Christian theology has never settled it. The patristic answer that it was paid to the devil was abandoned as absurd; the answer that it was paid to God raises the difficulty that God is also the one paying.

Facts
Disputed
Status Within the Tradition
Genuinely disputed within this tradition 1
The Encyclopedia of Religion (Macmillan Reference, 2005) traces how Jewish usage keeps redemption's biblical root sense of a public, historical deliverance, paradigmatically the exodus from slavery in Egypt, the rescue of a people rather than of an individual soul, while Christian usage narrowed the term toward the individual and toward sin, taking the price paid to be the death of Christ rather than the release from Egypt, a genuine change of referent rather than a mistranslation. The metaphor of a price paid then generates a question Christian theology has never settled, who receives it: the patristic answer that it was paid to the devil was abandoned by the medieval church as absurd, and the alternative that it was paid to God raises the difficulty that God is also the one paying, which is why the encyclopedia records the mechanism as argued rather than fixed.
The Claim
The Claim
In Christian usage, redemption names the deliverance of humanity from sin and its consequences through the death of Christ, cast in imagery of a price paid to free a captive or a slave. 2
Origins
Origin Period
1000 BCE to 1600 CE 1
Held By
Judaism; Christianity 1
Status
Doctrinal Category
Salvation and Liberation 1
Learn More
Buying Back, and Who Is Paid

Redemption is a metaphor before it is a doctrine, and the metaphor is legal and commercial: to redeem is to buy back, to secure release by payment. The Hebrew vocabulary is entirely concrete. The go'el is the kinsman-redeemer, the relative obliged to buy back a family member's land or person when they have fallen into debt or servitude (Leviticus 25:25-55), the institution that supplies the whole plot of the book of Ruth. Padah is the ransoming of a firstborn or a slave. From this domestic legal machinery the term is transferred to God, who "redeemed" Israel from Egypt (Exodus 6:6, Deuteronomy 7:8) and whom Isaiah repeatedly calls Israel's redeemer.

Transferring the metaphor raises the question every tradition that uses it has had to face: if a price is paid, to whom is it paid. Early Christian writers who pressed the ransom image, notably Origen and Gregory of Nyssa, answered that it was paid to the devil, who had acquired a claim over humanity, Gregory adding the image of the divinity concealed in the humanity as a hook concealed in bait. Gregory of Nazianzus objected sharply that the devil is owed nothing whatever and that paying him would be an outrage, and Anselm's Cur Deus Homo abandoned the scheme altogether in favour of satisfaction owed to God. The exchange is a good illustration of how a metaphor, pressed for consistency, generates doctrine and then generates objections to itself.

In Judaism, geulah remains chiefly corporate and historical. The Exodus is its paradigm, the return from exile its continuation, and the messianic age its completion, and the Passover Haggadah keeps the paradigm operative by requiring each person in every generation to see themselves as having personally come out of Egypt. Alongside this stands pidyon shevuyim, the redemption of captives, a major halakhic obligation with a long and grim practical history, and with its own rule, much discussed in modern Israeli debates over prisoner exchanges, that captives are not to be ransomed for more than their worth, lest further captures be encouraged.

In Christianity, redemption became one of several overlapping terms, with justification, reconciliation and atonement, for what Christ's death and resurrection accomplish, and the New Testament uses the purchase language directly: "you were bought with a price" (1 Corinthians 6:20). Modern theology has questioned whether transactional language distorts what it is used to describe, and liberation theologies have pushed the Exodus sense back to the front, reading redemption as historical liberation from oppression as well as deliverance from sin, a reading contested by those who regard it as reducing the doctrine to politics.

Already, and Not Yet

Christian and Jewish thought about redemption both wrestle with a gap between a decisive event already accomplished and a fullness still awaited, though they locate the gap differently.

In Christian theology, the tension is often named inaugurated eschatology, a phrase associated with the biblical scholar Oscar Cullmann, who compared it to the difference between D-Day and V-Day in the Second World War: the decisive battle has been won, but the war continues and final victory still lies ahead. On this account redemption in Christ is complete and effective now, "you were bought with a price," while its full manifestation, the resurrection of the body, the renewal of creation, the end of suffering, remains future. How much weight falls on the "already" versus the "not yet" divides Christian traditions: sacramental and pentecostal streams tend to emphasise present transformation and healing, while much of historic Protestant theology has stressed the futurity of full redemption to guard against triumphalism.

Jewish thought draws a related distinction between geulah peratit, individual or partial redemption such as rescue from a specific danger or exile, and geulah clalit, the complete, final and universal redemption of the messianic age, understood in classical sources to include the ingathering of exiles and the rebuilding of the Temple, though Maimonides gave a more restrained account, a world in which Jews keep the law free of persecution, with no suspension of nature's laws. Rabbinic literature debates whether the age can be hastened by merit and repentance or arrives on a fixed schedule known only to God.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including this tradition.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including this tradition.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)
Baptist, Denominations

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including this tradition.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including this tradition.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Redemption is held, with the emphasis falling on a process worked out in history rather than a single interrupting event.

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including this tradition.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)

Redemption is held as a future divine act, and for much of this stream it is the reason the present political restoration is not mistaken for it.

The ransom paid by Christ's death is the central saving act in this body's teaching, and it is the one occasion of the year on which the Memorial is kept.

Judaism, Religions
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Article III confesses that Christ was crucified and died to be a sacrifice not only for original guilt but for all actual sins of men.

Source The Augsburg ConfessionPhilipp Melanchthon

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including Methodism.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)

Redemption is held as a future divine act, and in this stream the modern return to the land is often read as its beginning.

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including this tradition.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)

Redemption is held as a future and public event, national as well as individual, tied to the coming of the messiah and the return from exile.

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including this tradition.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including this tradition.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including this tradition.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)

Redemption through Christ's sacrifice is affirmed across Nicene Christianity, including this tradition.

Source The Holy BibleAnonymous (multiple authors)

Rejected Here

Humanistic Judaism, Denominations

Redemption by divine act is rejected. What improvement the world receives is held to be the work of human beings and of nobody else.

Related To

Redemption is the commercial and legal metaphor the ransom account is built from, buying back what was pledged or enslaved.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Sources
1. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005s.v. RedemptionView the Source
2. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
The Augsburg Confession
Philipp Melanchthon, 1530The Augsburg Confession, Article III, Of the Son of GodView the Source
The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)
Anonymous (multiple authors)Leviticus 25:25-55; Exodus 6:6; Deuteronomy 7:8View the Source
The Holy Bible
Anonymous (multiple authors), Robert Barker, 16111 Corinthians 6:20; Ephesians 1:7View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.