Home›Sources›An Introduction to English RunesSourcesAn Introduction to English RunesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "An Introduction to English Runes." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/an-introduction-to-english-runes.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). An Introduction to English Runes. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/an-introduction-to-english-runesCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-an-introduction-to-english-runes, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {An Introduction to English Runes}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/an-introduction-to-english-runes}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXR. I. Page's introduction is notably skeptical of claims for runic magic and divination, and his own chapter addressing that question directly, distinguishing attested epigraphic use of runes from later modern occult use, is the standard scholarly point of reference other runologists cite on exactly that distinction. That named, specific scholarly contribution, not a claim about its press, is the real basis for its standing here. This is a second, revised edition. Use it for the historical form and attested use of runic writing and for the documented distinction between ancient epigraphic use and modern occult reinterpretation.FactsClaims Backed By This Source (318 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested1A standard scholarly introduction from an academic press, its author notably skeptical of claims for runic magic and divination, with a chapter on that question that other runologists cite as the usual point of reference.NotesWell-attestedSecond edition. The standard English-language introduction. Page is notably sceptical of claims for runic magic and divination, and his chapter on the subject is the usual scholarly point of reference for the distinction between attested epigraphic use and modern occult use.CitationAuthorWell-attestedR. I. PagePublisherWell-attestedBoydell PressPublication YearWell-attested1999URLWell-attestedhttps://archive.org/details/introductiontoen0000pageSource TypeWell-attestedacademic monographClaims Backed By This Source (318 claims)This source backs 318 claims across the atlas. As facts: 205 well-attested. As cited relationships: 52 holds. Plus 61 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicAnglo-Saxon Futhorc Runes, 238 claims: 157 well-attested, 52 holds, 29 general references.Articles, 43 claims: 39 well-attested, 4 general references.Runes, 24 claims: 24 general references.Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.Categories, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.Scripts & Magical Alphabets, 2 claims: 2 general references.Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.Well-attested205Anglo-Saxon Futhorc RunesAcAescBeorcCenDaegEarEhEohEolhEthelFeohGerGyfuHaeglIngIorIsLaguMannNydOsPeorthRadSigelThornTirUrWynnYrArticlesAc, the First of Five Anglo-Frisian AdditionsAesc, the Second Anglo-Frisian AdditionBeorc and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, BerkanoCen and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, KenazDaeg and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, DagazEar, the Fifth and Final Anglo-Frisian AdditionEh and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, EhwazEoh and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, EihwazEolh and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, AlgizEthel and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, OthalaFeoh and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, FehuGer and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, JeraGyfu and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, GeboHaegl and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, HagalazHeimdall's Aett, the Middle EightHow Rune Scholars Read the Purpose of the Threefold DivisionHow the Futhorc Grew Beyond the Elder FutharkIng and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, IngwazIor, the Fourth Anglo-Frisian AdditionIs and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, IsaLagu and Its Elder Futhark Cognate, LaguzShowing 1 to 50 of 66 entities carrying this claim. NextHolds52Anglo-Saxon Futhorc RunesAcAescBeorcCenDaegEhEohEolhEthelFeohGerGyfuHaeglIngIorIsLaguMannNydOsPeorthRadSigelThornTirUrWynnYrGeneral References61Anglo-Saxon Futhorc RunesAcAescBeorcCenDaegEarEhEohEolhEthelFeohGerGyfuHaeglIngIorIsLaguMannNydOsPeorthRadSigelThornTirUrWynnYrArticlesAesc, the Second Anglo-Frisian AdditionHeimdall's Aett, the Middle EightHow Rune Scholars Read the Purpose of the Threefold DivisionHow the Futhorc Grew Beyond the Elder FutharkCategoriesRunesRegionsBritainRunesAlgizAnsuzBerkanoDagazEhwazEihwazFehuGeboHagalazIngwazIsaJeraKenazLaguzMannazShowing 1 to 50 of 61 entities carrying this claim. NextComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year