Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Ancient Israel: What Do We Know and How Do We Know It?

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Lester Grabbe is a historian of ancient Israel and the Second Temple period, and this book's whole method is stated in its title, it asks what can actually be known and by what evidence, rather than retelling the biblical narrative as history. It works by laying archaeological findings, extra biblical texts and the biblical account side by side and saying plainly where they agree, where they conflict and where the evidence simply runs out. That transparency about uncertainty is its main strength, and also its limit for a reader wanting a single confident narrative, Grabbe often concludes that a question cannot be settled rather than picking a side. Published as an academic monograph, it is written for readers willing to sit with unresolved historical questions rather than for devotional use.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Lester L. Grabbe's source-by-source audit of what the archaeological and textual evidence for ancient Israel will and will not bear; cited here for the historicity of the patriarchs, Moses, Joshua, David and Solomon precisely because it reports the state of the scholarly debate rather than settling it.
Notes
A source-by-source audit of what the evidence for ancient Israel will and will not bear. Cited here for the historicity of the patriarchs, Moses, Joshua, David and Solomon precisely because it reports the state of the debate instead of settling it.
Citation
Author
Lester L. Grabbe
Publisher
T&T Clark / Bloomsbury
Publication Year
2007
URL
https://archive.org/details/ancientisraelwha0000grab
Source Type
Monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Israel, Countries

This source names Israel directly: "Lester Grabbe is a historian of ancient Israel and the Second Temple period, and this book's whole method is stated in its title, it asks what can actually be known and by what evidence, rather than..."

Claims Backed By This Source (67 claims)

This source backs 67 claims across the atlas. As facts: 29 well-attested, 18 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 19 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Figures, 44 claims: 11 well-attested, 18 scholarly debate, 15 general references.
  • Articles, 10 claims: 10 well-attested.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Cultures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Empires & Polities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Historical Periods, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.